News

"The Court has jurisdiction to enforce its preliminary injunctions to preserve the status quo, but it does not have ...
Alito's concerns about "loopholes" in the Supreme Court's universal injunctions ruling emerge as judges issue sweeping ...
Birthright citizenship ruling backs US president’s claims that lower courts have interfered with policy initiatives ...
The Supreme Court’s ruling in a case on birthright citizenship gave an ominous warning to those challenging other Trump ...
President Donald Trump and his legal team eye next steps after the Supreme Court curbed lower court judges' ability to issue ...
Unfortunately, lawmakers repealed it in 1976. Bring back the three-panel court for constitutional challenges.
Yesterday, in a 6–3 decision in Trump v. CASA, the United States Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration in a case ...
The ruling is ideologically neutral and will apply when Republicans are in the minority and a Democrat occupies the White ...
OP-ED. Public law professor Julien Jeanneney voices concern over the recent elimination by the highest court in the United ...
Friday’s decision limits the circumstances under which the court can issue nationwide injunctions — orders that stop a federal law or policy from being enforced while court battles play out.
The recent decision of the Supreme Court denying the nation’s thousand-odd federal district judges the power, absent class action treatment, to grant nationwide injunctions has generated hysteria ...
Today's 6-3 Supreme Court decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc. barring nationwide injunctions is a grave mistake. It risks allowing the executive to engage in large-scale violations of constitutional ...