The Supreme Court’s ruling in a case on birthright citizenship gave an ominous warning to those challenging other Trump ...

"The Court has jurisdiction to enforce its preliminary injunctions to preserve the status quo, but it does not have ...

Unfortunately, lawmakers repealed it in 1976. Bring back the three-panel court for constitutional challenges.

Politics and intellectual consistency go together like a banana on pizza. But the reaction from Democrats to last week’s ...

Yesterday, in a 6–3 decision in Trump v. CASA, the United States Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration in a case ...

Friday’s decision limits the circumstances under which the court can issue nationwide injunctions — orders that stop a federal law or policy from being enforced while court battles play out.

In Trump v. CASA, the Supreme Court significantly narrowed federal courts’ power to issue “universal” or “nationwide” ...

The ‘Fox News Sunday’ panel discusses the Supreme Court’s major decision on the legality of nationwide injunctions and more.

The Supreme Court 'could have simply decided that the 14th Amendment's clear mandate that "all persons born or naturalized in ...

OP-ED. Public law professor Julien Jeanneney voices concern over the recent elimination by the highest court in the United ...

The US Supreme Court’s decision limiting universal injunctions will immediately complicate ongoing federal workforce ...

Today's Supreme Court ruling barring nationwide injunctions could empower the federal government to engage in large-scale violations of the Constitution. Exactly how bad the consequences will be ...